Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
I happened to be listening to some back to school coverage on TV this morning and of course the Common Core standard was brought up along with the question of college readiness. As we have been homeschooling now for two years and our twins are entering 10th grade we have been thinking a lot about these two related but separate questions: (1) how do we help our kids get ready for college (they both want to go) and (2) how do we convince colleges that they are in fact ready.
So this past summer we hired someone to contact admission offices at a diverse set of schools. What we found was quite interesting. First, we got first hand confirmation of what has already been reported in the press: more and more schools are making standardized tests optional. Second, we found there is a catch: almost all of the schools that have dropped the SAT requirement in general are still maintaining it for homeschoolers.
Of course from the perspective of the colleges this makes some sense. Homeschooler transcripts have self-reported grades which may or may not represent a fair assessment of the applicant’s performance. For many high schools instead the admissions offices have a fairly precise idea what a certain transcript represents. Given that admissions committees often talk for only minutes when deciding an individual case that matters a lot.
So, what is to be done? Susan and I believe it makes sense to create an alternative credentialing system for homeschoolers and possibly for students who come from new and more experimental schools. We are thinking about something along the lines of a combination of evaluating a student’s portfolio combined with a video interview. If you are aware of any efforts in this direction, we would love to hear about them!
I happened to be listening to some back to school coverage on TV this morning and of course the Common Core standard was brought up along with the question of college readiness. As we have been homeschooling now for two years and our twins are entering 10th grade we have been thinking a lot about these two related but separate questions: (1) how do we help our kids get ready for college (they both want to go) and (2) how do we convince colleges that they are in fact ready.
So this past summer we hired someone to contact admission offices at a diverse set of schools. What we found was quite interesting. First, we got first hand confirmation of what has already been reported in the press: more and more schools are making standardized tests optional. Second, we found there is a catch: almost all of the schools that have dropped the SAT requirement in general are still maintaining it for homeschoolers.
Of course from the perspective of the colleges this makes some sense. Homeschooler transcripts have self-reported grades which may or may not represent a fair assessment of the applicant’s performance. For many high schools instead the admissions offices have a fairly precise idea what a certain transcript represents. Given that admissions committees often talk for only minutes when deciding an individual case that matters a lot.
So, what is to be done? Susan and I believe it makes sense to create an alternative credentialing system for homeschoolers and possibly for students who come from new and more experimental schools. We are thinking about something along the lines of a combination of evaluating a student’s portfolio combined with a video interview. If you are aware of any efforts in this direction, we would love to hear about them!
No comments yet