Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
One of the all time great opening lines is from Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina:
Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.
I am beginning to think that the opposite is true for (web) startups. There seem to be surprisingly many roads to success. But the canonical road to trouble appears to be taking your burn rate up *before* you have something that is really working.
Over the past couple of weeks I have seen two startups that are in very different positions, despite superficial similarities. They both have fully launched services in interesting areas and with some traction but that have not yet really taken off. They are both iterating on their services. But one has spent $5 million already whereas the other has spent less than one tenth of that.
The mood between the two companies couldn’t be more different. One is filled with excitement about a new twist on their service that they are pursuing at a current burn rate of less than $40K per month, which represents the highest it has been. The other is struggling to make changes they know they need but their burn is still $100K per month, despite having come down significantly from where it has been.
Only time will tell whether the low burn rate company will succeed, but they have a great many more options available for themselves. They could get acquired and have in fact had some offers (they do have some traction after all) and even a modest acquisition would pay back investors and leave something over for the founders. They could raise just a bit more money and keep iterating for a long time. Or if they happen to hit it right with their latest iteration they can quickly and cleanly raise a fair bit of money.
Nothing really new here in this post – this is after all the mantra of the lean startup movement – but it can’t be said often enough! And this recent experience brought the contrast home so starkly that I felt compelled to write about it not just for others but as a reminder to myself.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=3840,quality=85/http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=30788430-1711-42db-870e-60c517f9b587)
One of the all time great opening lines is from Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina:
Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.
I am beginning to think that the opposite is true for (web) startups. There seem to be surprisingly many roads to success. But the canonical road to trouble appears to be taking your burn rate up *before* you have something that is really working.
Over the past couple of weeks I have seen two startups that are in very different positions, despite superficial similarities. They both have fully launched services in interesting areas and with some traction but that have not yet really taken off. They are both iterating on their services. But one has spent $5 million already whereas the other has spent less than one tenth of that.
The mood between the two companies couldn’t be more different. One is filled with excitement about a new twist on their service that they are pursuing at a current burn rate of less than $40K per month, which represents the highest it has been. The other is struggling to make changes they know they need but their burn is still $100K per month, despite having come down significantly from where it has been.
Only time will tell whether the low burn rate company will succeed, but they have a great many more options available for themselves. They could get acquired and have in fact had some offers (they do have some traction after all) and even a modest acquisition would pay back investors and leave something over for the founders. They could raise just a bit more money and keep iterating for a long time. Or if they happen to hit it right with their latest iteration they can quickly and cleanly raise a fair bit of money.
Nothing really new here in this post – this is after all the mantra of the lean startup movement – but it can’t be said often enough! And this recent experience brought the contrast home so starkly that I felt compelled to write about it not just for others but as a reminder to myself.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=3840,quality=85/http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=30788430-1711-42db-870e-60c517f9b587)
No comments yet