Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...
Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...
Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
It is 2010 and while we don’t have jetpacks, it doesn’t seem too much to ask to not have to deal with paper stock certificates. Yet most early stage deals that I see still wind up sending out physical paper certificates. While it may seem like a convenient way to push out the expense of keeping track of certificates to holders, that is not really the case. Whenever a transaction takes place that requires the certificates, such as a secondary sale or an exit, there are people who can’t find theirs (not surprising, this is often 5-10 years later). That causes delays, stress and legal work at the time of the transaction. Generally, people don’t want to punish their early stage investors for having lost or misplaced the certificates and so the solution winds up being that investors sign an affidavit of loss. I believe it would a be net cheaper and more convenient for everyone if company counsel just maintained a stock register without issuing certs. If a company gets sufficiently large – in terms of revenues and number of owners – that job can be handed over to a custody service. Would love to know if there are any compelling reasons for carrying on with paper certificates!
It is 2010 and while we don’t have jetpacks, it doesn’t seem too much to ask to not have to deal with paper stock certificates. Yet most early stage deals that I see still wind up sending out physical paper certificates. While it may seem like a convenient way to push out the expense of keeping track of certificates to holders, that is not really the case. Whenever a transaction takes place that requires the certificates, such as a secondary sale or an exit, there are people who can’t find theirs (not surprising, this is often 5-10 years later). That causes delays, stress and legal work at the time of the transaction. Generally, people don’t want to punish their early stage investors for having lost or misplaced the certificates and so the solution winds up being that investors sign an affidavit of loss. I believe it would a be net cheaper and more convenient for everyone if company counsel just maintained a stock register without issuing certs. If a company gets sufficiently large – in terms of revenues and number of owners – that job can be handed over to a custody service. Would love to know if there are any compelling reasons for carrying on with paper certificates!
No comments yet