Last Uncertainty Wednesday, I wrote about how sample correlations are not meaningful under fat tails. Today I want to continue this line of argument in the specific context of the claimed relationship between country IQ and GDP. There is strong evidence that the distribution of GDP growth rates is in fact fat tailed. Why look at growth rates instead of absolute numbers? Because the whole argument has to be a dynamic one and not a static one. We can best see this from the following illustratio...