Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Yesterday, I started a series of posts about how the move to cloud computing is affecting competition. The second question I posed was how cloud computing changes the boundary between “infrastructure” and “applications”?
At the most basic level I believe that some things that were standalone applications will become features that are provided by the cloud. We have seen this play out with content. Essentially, the web to date has been “content in the cloud.” And one of the most important developments has been the syndication of content. Weather is a great example. Sure, occasionally I still go to weather.com but more likely I am seeing the weather on a widget inside another page or on my desktop.
Cloud computing is doing the same for “functionality in the cloud.” Take backup for example. Most of us now run backup applications for our laptop computers – as more of the data is stored in the cloud, backup as a separate standalone application will gradually disappear. But what about applications that are already web delivered, such as blogging platforms? Much of the application code inside of today’s blogging platforms is likely to be provided by the cloud (storing posts, providing RSS feeds, etc.) That raises hard questions about what it means to be a blogging platform and how to differentiate yourself from others. Until recently, one of the benefits of wordpress.com was that you did not have to deal with installing the wordpress code at a hosting company (and paying for hosting). But with Google AppEngine and similar offerings those hurdles will essentially disappear.
So to answer the original question, with cloud computing, the boundary between “infrastructure” and “applications” will shift squeezing the room for applications and absorbing more into the infrastructure.
Yesterday, I started a series of posts about how the move to cloud computing is affecting competition. The second question I posed was how cloud computing changes the boundary between “infrastructure” and “applications”?
At the most basic level I believe that some things that were standalone applications will become features that are provided by the cloud. We have seen this play out with content. Essentially, the web to date has been “content in the cloud.” And one of the most important developments has been the syndication of content. Weather is a great example. Sure, occasionally I still go to weather.com but more likely I am seeing the weather on a widget inside another page or on my desktop.
Cloud computing is doing the same for “functionality in the cloud.” Take backup for example. Most of us now run backup applications for our laptop computers – as more of the data is stored in the cloud, backup as a separate standalone application will gradually disappear. But what about applications that are already web delivered, such as blogging platforms? Much of the application code inside of today’s blogging platforms is likely to be provided by the cloud (storing posts, providing RSS feeds, etc.) That raises hard questions about what it means to be a blogging platform and how to differentiate yourself from others. Until recently, one of the benefits of wordpress.com was that you did not have to deal with installing the wordpress code at a hosting company (and paying for hosting). But with Google AppEngine and similar offerings those hurdles will essentially disappear.
So to answer the original question, with cloud computing, the boundary between “infrastructure” and “applications” will shift squeezing the room for applications and absorbing more into the infrastructure.
No comments yet