Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Yesterday I wrote about the need for competition in search from an Internet ecosystem perspective. But what if you are a shareholder in Yahoo or Microsoft? Should they outsource search to Google? Here too I believe the answer is a clear NO. If Google did not have grand ambitions that are directly competitive with large parts of Yahoo and Microsoft then this might make sense – but one would hardly recommend to GM to buy their engines from Toyota. Yes, there is a lot to a car other than the engine, but it’s difficult at best to be in the car business long term if you are buying the engine from a competitor.
This is not to say that Yahoo hasn’t made huge execution mistakes. As a public company when you make mistakes of that magnitude you may not be given the chance to fix them the right way but instead be forced into a short term fix or even a change of control.
Interestingly it’s also far from clear whether Google is really maximizing value for their own shareholders. Google is plowing much of the profit from the search advertising business into a series of startup businesses. The bigger a spend they build up, the less they will be in a position to split the spoils of search advertising more evenly with sites and searchers, leaving themselves open to competitive moves such as Microsoft’s cash back shopping search. That will not matter if the Google’s new initiatives become big cash producers in their own right, but that is as of yet unproven.
Yesterday I wrote about the need for competition in search from an Internet ecosystem perspective. But what if you are a shareholder in Yahoo or Microsoft? Should they outsource search to Google? Here too I believe the answer is a clear NO. If Google did not have grand ambitions that are directly competitive with large parts of Yahoo and Microsoft then this might make sense – but one would hardly recommend to GM to buy their engines from Toyota. Yes, there is a lot to a car other than the engine, but it’s difficult at best to be in the car business long term if you are buying the engine from a competitor.
This is not to say that Yahoo hasn’t made huge execution mistakes. As a public company when you make mistakes of that magnitude you may not be given the chance to fix them the right way but instead be forced into a short term fix or even a change of control.
Interestingly it’s also far from clear whether Google is really maximizing value for their own shareholders. Google is plowing much of the profit from the search advertising business into a series of startup businesses. The bigger a spend they build up, the less they will be in a position to split the spoils of search advertising more evenly with sites and searchers, leaving themselves open to competitive moves such as Microsoft’s cash back shopping search. That will not matter if the Google’s new initiatives become big cash producers in their own right, but that is as of yet unproven.
No comments yet