Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
The demand for books, music, news, TV, phone calls is constrained by the time that people have. In a mature market (e.g., the US) that time is growing at best at the rate of population growth (low single digits), but in reality is likely to be shrinking as other online activities (e.g., social networking) take up time. The supply for all of the above, however, is increasing by one or more orders of magnitude, as anyone can be a publisher and as the cost of bandwidth has plummeted.
The basic mechanisms of economics are not broken (yet) and when rapidly growing supply meets with steady or shrinking demand, price drops – in many cases all the way to free. That is exactly what is happening in a number of industries. But now we are getting into the next round. Demand is so inelastic (again because time and attention to consume are essentially fixed), that as price drops the total industry size starts to decrease. And industries with declining market sizes have many interesting aspects that we now all seeing themselves play out.
When the pie is getting smaller the only way to have more is to take it away from others. That is at the root of the fights over cable fees (Fox vs TimeWarner), paywalls (newspapers vs Google), rights to scan (book publishers vs Google), net neutrality (web vs telcos), music (artist vs labels), and so on. These are all fights over how to distribute shrinking pies. Along with these fights we will also see more mergers and more calls for government regulation. I predict that things will get a lot uglier before they get better!
The demand for books, music, news, TV, phone calls is constrained by the time that people have. In a mature market (e.g., the US) that time is growing at best at the rate of population growth (low single digits), but in reality is likely to be shrinking as other online activities (e.g., social networking) take up time. The supply for all of the above, however, is increasing by one or more orders of magnitude, as anyone can be a publisher and as the cost of bandwidth has plummeted.
The basic mechanisms of economics are not broken (yet) and when rapidly growing supply meets with steady or shrinking demand, price drops – in many cases all the way to free. That is exactly what is happening in a number of industries. But now we are getting into the next round. Demand is so inelastic (again because time and attention to consume are essentially fixed), that as price drops the total industry size starts to decrease. And industries with declining market sizes have many interesting aspects that we now all seeing themselves play out.
When the pie is getting smaller the only way to have more is to take it away from others. That is at the root of the fights over cable fees (Fox vs TimeWarner), paywalls (newspapers vs Google), rights to scan (book publishers vs Google), net neutrality (web vs telcos), music (artist vs labels), and so on. These are all fights over how to distribute shrinking pies. Along with these fights we will also see more mergers and more calls for government regulation. I predict that things will get a lot uglier before they get better!
No comments yet