Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Yesterday I tweeted the following quick thought about healthcare reform:
Reading abt passage of healthcare reform. At this point any reform beats no reform: once there is movement, the course can be corrected
Just wanted to quickly expand on the idea behind this, which comes from sailing (one of my favorite hobbies). With a sailboat you can find yourself “in locks” which happens when you get stuck with the wind coming directly from the front. In that situation you may slow to a complete stop and lose “steerage,” meaning the boat does not respond to the helm. A sailboat can only change course when it is moving because otherwise there is no water moving across the rudder and hence the rudder has no effect. The solution to this situation is generally to “back” one of the sails manually (meaning pushing it out so that it catches the wind) and turn the boat. Sometimes this result in the boat moving backwards! But as a sailor you just care that the boat moves again because now you can use the rudder and correct the course.
Our healthcare system reminds me of a sail boat “in locks” – completely stuck with no movement and hence no ability to correct course! So while even many reasonable people find fault with the reform (for some it goes too far, for others not far enough), at least we are getting the health care boat moving. Once there is movement we will see where we are actually headed, which is likely to be somewhat different from what everyone anticipates. With that momentum there will be the possibility for course corrections.
If you are not doing so already, I strongly recommend following Jay Parkinson on Tumblr for many interesting posts about healthcare.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=3840,quality=85/http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=59b0e037-edba-4653-ad40-fec5f696b9c6)
Yesterday I tweeted the following quick thought about healthcare reform:
Reading abt passage of healthcare reform. At this point any reform beats no reform: once there is movement, the course can be corrected
Just wanted to quickly expand on the idea behind this, which comes from sailing (one of my favorite hobbies). With a sailboat you can find yourself “in locks” which happens when you get stuck with the wind coming directly from the front. In that situation you may slow to a complete stop and lose “steerage,” meaning the boat does not respond to the helm. A sailboat can only change course when it is moving because otherwise there is no water moving across the rudder and hence the rudder has no effect. The solution to this situation is generally to “back” one of the sails manually (meaning pushing it out so that it catches the wind) and turn the boat. Sometimes this result in the boat moving backwards! But as a sailor you just care that the boat moves again because now you can use the rudder and correct the course.
Our healthcare system reminds me of a sail boat “in locks” – completely stuck with no movement and hence no ability to correct course! So while even many reasonable people find fault with the reform (for some it goes too far, for others not far enough), at least we are getting the health care boat moving. Once there is movement we will see where we are actually headed, which is likely to be somewhat different from what everyone anticipates. With that momentum there will be the possibility for course corrections.
If you are not doing so already, I strongly recommend following Jay Parkinson on Tumblr for many interesting posts about healthcare.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=3840,quality=85/http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=59b0e037-edba-4653-ad40-fec5f696b9c6)
No comments yet