Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Companies across our portfolio are spending a lot of resources on suppressing various types of undesirable behavior ranging from comment spam to outright financial fraud. Much of this could be avoided through a probabilistic identity system. I have written about this idea before, but nobody has cracked the nut on it and the problem has only grown since. The solution to identity on the Internet is not to try for certainty and systems aiming for certainty will fail because they need to impose too many restrictions on users (would be the same effect that DRM has had on the user experience created by publishers and the music industry).
Instead, what is needed is a service that takes many signals as inputs, including Facebook, Twitter, Disqus, general web presence, and so on. That may be enough for a new social media service to establish whether someone is a real user or just a rapidly created fake account. For services such as banking that need higher degrees of certainty, it should be possible given these inputs to dynamically generate a few questions for the user to answer. Questions might be like “which of these three pictures did you publish to Twitter?” or “which of these three bands do you like best?”
The best product in this direction seems to be Lexis Nexis InstantID which draws mostly on public records about where people have lived. Adding that and additional offline data into a web service could be used to further improve it’s accuracy. If this kind of service were reasonably priced, I am convinced that it would find massive adoption.
Companies across our portfolio are spending a lot of resources on suppressing various types of undesirable behavior ranging from comment spam to outright financial fraud. Much of this could be avoided through a probabilistic identity system. I have written about this idea before, but nobody has cracked the nut on it and the problem has only grown since. The solution to identity on the Internet is not to try for certainty and systems aiming for certainty will fail because they need to impose too many restrictions on users (would be the same effect that DRM has had on the user experience created by publishers and the music industry).
Instead, what is needed is a service that takes many signals as inputs, including Facebook, Twitter, Disqus, general web presence, and so on. That may be enough for a new social media service to establish whether someone is a real user or just a rapidly created fake account. For services such as banking that need higher degrees of certainty, it should be possible given these inputs to dynamically generate a few questions for the user to answer. Questions might be like “which of these three pictures did you publish to Twitter?” or “which of these three bands do you like best?”
The best product in this direction seems to be Lexis Nexis InstantID which draws mostly on public records about where people have lived. Adding that and additional offline data into a web service could be used to further improve it’s accuracy. If this kind of service were reasonably priced, I am convinced that it would find massive adoption.
No comments yet