Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Yesterday’s “reveal” of the iPad was predictably anti-climactic. With the hype that had built up, anything short of a mind-reading, teleporting device had to be a bit of a letdown. But we are now likely to enter the phase of underestimating the iPad. People are already obsessing about such flaws as the omission of a camera. Or the lack of support for Flash. Or the absence of multi-tasking. These critiques mostly miss a couple of crucial points. First, this is of course extremely similar to the history of the iPhone - what, no Cut-and-Paste? Apple very quickly came out with significant product improvements for the iPhone. I expect that it will be no different for the iPad. Second, while Apple wants you to have a great web experience, they want you to have an even better experience for certain categories (games, videos) through native apps for which Apple takes a cut. If they get enough devices out quickly that will succeed. Third, out of the gate the iPad meets four of my five personal requirements, which I had set out here http://continuations.com/post/321509690/slates-my-personal-requirements . It is much cheaper than had been rumored, making it possible to get more than one for the house. It looks like it would survive a coffee spill and 10 hrs of battery life would be an entire week of occasional usage around the house. Because it doesn’t have multi-tasking it is much simpler to operate. There is a Wifi only option. The only thing that seems to be missing out of the gate are user profiles that would make it easy to share. Bottomline, this is very much the device that I anticipated and I believe that it would be a mistake to dismiss it as an XXL iPod Touch.
Yesterday’s “reveal” of the iPad was predictably anti-climactic. With the hype that had built up, anything short of a mind-reading, teleporting device had to be a bit of a letdown. But we are now likely to enter the phase of underestimating the iPad. People are already obsessing about such flaws as the omission of a camera. Or the lack of support for Flash. Or the absence of multi-tasking. These critiques mostly miss a couple of crucial points. First, this is of course extremely similar to the history of the iPhone - what, no Cut-and-Paste? Apple very quickly came out with significant product improvements for the iPhone. I expect that it will be no different for the iPad. Second, while Apple wants you to have a great web experience, they want you to have an even better experience for certain categories (games, videos) through native apps for which Apple takes a cut. If they get enough devices out quickly that will succeed. Third, out of the gate the iPad meets four of my five personal requirements, which I had set out here http://continuations.com/post/321509690/slates-my-personal-requirements . It is much cheaper than had been rumored, making it possible to get more than one for the house. It looks like it would survive a coffee spill and 10 hrs of battery life would be an entire week of occasional usage around the house. Because it doesn’t have multi-tasking it is much simpler to operate. There is a Wifi only option. The only thing that seems to be missing out of the gate are user profiles that would make it easy to share. Bottomline, this is very much the device that I anticipated and I believe that it would be a mistake to dismiss it as an XXL iPod Touch.
No comments yet