>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
LivingSocial yesterday was selling $20 for $10, which is a good deal for everyone buying it (and remembering to then make use of their Amazon gift card). Not surprisingly, they sold at least 1 million for a total value of $20 million. Now if everyone who bought one of these were a new LivingSocial registered user, that would amount to a $10 customer acquisition cost. That’s of course a lower bound because there are likely to have been quite a few existing LivingSocial users and some fraction of the new users who signed up just for this deal may never sign up for another deal. So as a swag lets call it $20 per new customer.
Given the various rumor numbers that have floated around about the profitability of Groupon’s and LivingSocial’s businesses that would seem like a reasonable price to pay since it is (by those accounts) far lower than the lifetime value of a customer. The big question though is whether this will last. We might have easily been witnessing the first step towards the kind of competition that drives profits down rapidly as companies in the deal space start to pay more and more to try to bring customer attention their way. What can’t be long behind is companies offering a better split to merchants who offer discounts as a way to acquire more of those.
How long this process of “dissipating” excess profits will take depends on how defensible the respective networks are. I have previously argued that the deal space networks are not really defensible. Looks like we might see sooner rather than later whether that is true.

LivingSocial yesterday was selling $20 for $10, which is a good deal for everyone buying it (and remembering to then make use of their Amazon gift card). Not surprisingly, they sold at least 1 million for a total value of $20 million. Now if everyone who bought one of these were a new LivingSocial registered user, that would amount to a $10 customer acquisition cost. That’s of course a lower bound because there are likely to have been quite a few existing LivingSocial users and some fraction of the new users who signed up just for this deal may never sign up for another deal. So as a swag lets call it $20 per new customer.
Given the various rumor numbers that have floated around about the profitability of Groupon’s and LivingSocial’s businesses that would seem like a reasonable price to pay since it is (by those accounts) far lower than the lifetime value of a customer. The big question though is whether this will last. We might have easily been witnessing the first step towards the kind of competition that drives profits down rapidly as companies in the deal space start to pay more and more to try to bring customer attention their way. What can’t be long behind is companies offering a better split to merchants who offer discounts as a way to acquire more of those.
How long this process of “dissipating” excess profits will take depends on how defensible the respective networks are. I have previously argued that the deal space networks are not really defensible. Looks like we might see sooner rather than later whether that is true.

No comments yet