Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Fred had a good post yesterday about why he considers Y-Combinator the “Best Deal in Startup Land." I believe that also and want to add a key reason for it: An intense focus on making versus planning. By entering Y-Combinator, teams commit themselves to a mad sprint to get something built. Ideally something that works well enough or is far enough along to actually launch before or shortly after demo day.
That is a completely different approach from that taken by business plan competitions. Most of those put all the emphasis on planning. I recently met with a team from ITP that is entering an NYU business plan competition. The team consists of folks who all know how to design and program. Yet the emphasis of the business plan competition was all about pairing them with an MBA and working on such things as market size and go to market strategy.
I told them that if I were in their position I would spend as little time as possible on the planning and focus instead of turning their prototype into a working system and getting that out into the real world. They will learn more about the viability of what they are working on (and more about business) then any amount of planning could tell them.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=3840,quality=85/http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=c74332ff-7ebc-4f14-9656-72d26a46b94e)
Fred had a good post yesterday about why he considers Y-Combinator the “Best Deal in Startup Land." I believe that also and want to add a key reason for it: An intense focus on making versus planning. By entering Y-Combinator, teams commit themselves to a mad sprint to get something built. Ideally something that works well enough or is far enough along to actually launch before or shortly after demo day.
That is a completely different approach from that taken by business plan competitions. Most of those put all the emphasis on planning. I recently met with a team from ITP that is entering an NYU business plan competition. The team consists of folks who all know how to design and program. Yet the emphasis of the business plan competition was all about pairing them with an MBA and working on such things as market size and go to market strategy.
I told them that if I were in their position I would spend as little time as possible on the planning and focus instead of turning their prototype into a working system and getting that out into the real world. They will learn more about the viability of what they are working on (and more about business) then any amount of planning could tell them.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=3840,quality=85/http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=c74332ff-7ebc-4f14-9656-72d26a46b94e)
No comments yet