Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
This morning in scanning Techmeme while having my early morning cup of coffee, I noticed two separate items about TLDs. First up, a post from Techcrunch on how .cm domains are opening up for pre-order. Second, an entry from Slate on how ICANN is planning to further expand the available TLDs. Last year, I wrote that I believe “New TLDs Are Highway Robbery” – they are simply a tax on the system.
To some extent search is solving this problem as few people these days type domain names directly into their browser bar. So one might argue that companies should not worry about typos or squatters, but that ignores other ways in which extra TLDs could be manipulated. For instance, there is the problem of trademark dilution – if you let folks register your domain in other TLDs you are may be reducing your ability to enforce your trademark. There is also the issue of phishing. Additional TLDs make it easier to create links that look like the real thing but go to a phishing site.
So, ICANN, let’s please stick with the TLDs we already have!
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=3840,quality=85/http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=7e55e09e-3057-4ee8-a74f-49b1a760f78e)
This morning in scanning Techmeme while having my early morning cup of coffee, I noticed two separate items about TLDs. First up, a post from Techcrunch on how .cm domains are opening up for pre-order. Second, an entry from Slate on how ICANN is planning to further expand the available TLDs. Last year, I wrote that I believe “New TLDs Are Highway Robbery” – they are simply a tax on the system.
To some extent search is solving this problem as few people these days type domain names directly into their browser bar. So one might argue that companies should not worry about typos or squatters, but that ignores other ways in which extra TLDs could be manipulated. For instance, there is the problem of trademark dilution – if you let folks register your domain in other TLDs you are may be reducing your ability to enforce your trademark. There is also the issue of phishing. Additional TLDs make it easier to create links that look like the real thing but go to a phishing site.
So, ICANN, let’s please stick with the TLDs we already have!
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=3840,quality=85/http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=7e55e09e-3057-4ee8-a74f-49b1a760f78e)
No comments yet