Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>300 subscribers
>300 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
I have tried out quite a few social news readers and they all suffer from pretty much the same flaw: they give me more of the same. I will already have seen most of the stories that they present in either Twitter or Tumblr or Techmeme. What I really need is a reader that gives me the opposing view. For instance, when I see a tweet about the “pied piper” version of the Brooklyn Bridge arrests from this weekend, I would love to also see a tweet about the NYT blog posts that presents two police videos.
I realize that is a much harder problem to solve. On one level I could arguably solve it myself by following a more diverse group of people and I do some of that. But it’s difficult to find people who hold opposing viewpoints (Twitter’s suggested “whom to follow” doesn’t help here), especially across a wide range of topics. My feed has probably less than 10% opposing views which means that they tend to get drowned out. Instead, for each topic, I would love to be able to drill down into both “similar” and “opposing” views. This would also be great as a browser plug in, so that when you are already outside of a social system and on a “story” page you can still bring that exploration with you.
My desire for this “Opposing Views Reader” is related to my concern about information cascades. In general, we seem to be building too many positive re-enforcement systems on the web. How about “agree” and “disagree” buttons? If all you can do is “like” or “favorite” items, it becomes very hard to express that you care about something but have a different opinion. Would love to hear if others feel the same need and find out if anyone is working on a solution.

I have tried out quite a few social news readers and they all suffer from pretty much the same flaw: they give me more of the same. I will already have seen most of the stories that they present in either Twitter or Tumblr or Techmeme. What I really need is a reader that gives me the opposing view. For instance, when I see a tweet about the “pied piper” version of the Brooklyn Bridge arrests from this weekend, I would love to also see a tweet about the NYT blog posts that presents two police videos.
I realize that is a much harder problem to solve. On one level I could arguably solve it myself by following a more diverse group of people and I do some of that. But it’s difficult to find people who hold opposing viewpoints (Twitter’s suggested “whom to follow” doesn’t help here), especially across a wide range of topics. My feed has probably less than 10% opposing views which means that they tend to get drowned out. Instead, for each topic, I would love to be able to drill down into both “similar” and “opposing” views. This would also be great as a browser plug in, so that when you are already outside of a social system and on a “story” page you can still bring that exploration with you.
My desire for this “Opposing Views Reader” is related to my concern about information cascades. In general, we seem to be building too many positive re-enforcement systems on the web. How about “agree” and “disagree” buttons? If all you can do is “like” or “favorite” items, it becomes very hard to express that you care about something but have a different opinion. Would love to hear if others feel the same need and find out if anyone is working on a solution.

No comments yet