Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
We recently installed a Nest to control the heating and air conditioning. On a subsequent muggy day I was about to pick up the phone to call home and see if someone was there to turn on the AC (we were expecting guests) when I remembered that I could now do that remotely! I fired up the Nest app and just a few seconds later I happily settled back into work. An hour later when I showed up at home I was surprised it was still quite muggy until I realized that all the windows were open and our poor AC had been attempting to cool the neighborhood!
There is an important lesson here – making one aspect of your home remote controlled may lead you to want (need) to control others (here windows). The experience itself was really quite compelling and I am now researching what the cheapest sensors are that I can get to determine if the windows are open or closed. In fact at least for some of the windows the alarm system should already know that. Ideally of course I could close the windows remotely although that raises some other interesting questions (what if someone not only opened the window but put a plant there or Dori our dog is sticking her nose out the window).
One other lesson that I came away with is that it will be perfectly fine to control different parts of the home from different applications. I already now use the Sonos app to control music and the Nest app to control temperature. I would be perfectly happy using a separate app to control a smart lock on the front door, such as the August or Kisi. Which suggests that the strategy of being the central controller for the home may be flawed at a time when there is a lot of innovation around individual aspect of home automation (all of which can have their own complete experience).
We recently installed a Nest to control the heating and air conditioning. On a subsequent muggy day I was about to pick up the phone to call home and see if someone was there to turn on the AC (we were expecting guests) when I remembered that I could now do that remotely! I fired up the Nest app and just a few seconds later I happily settled back into work. An hour later when I showed up at home I was surprised it was still quite muggy until I realized that all the windows were open and our poor AC had been attempting to cool the neighborhood!
There is an important lesson here – making one aspect of your home remote controlled may lead you to want (need) to control others (here windows). The experience itself was really quite compelling and I am now researching what the cheapest sensors are that I can get to determine if the windows are open or closed. In fact at least for some of the windows the alarm system should already know that. Ideally of course I could close the windows remotely although that raises some other interesting questions (what if someone not only opened the window but put a plant there or Dori our dog is sticking her nose out the window).
One other lesson that I came away with is that it will be perfectly fine to control different parts of the home from different applications. I already now use the Sonos app to control music and the Nest app to control temperature. I would be perfectly happy using a separate app to control a smart lock on the front door, such as the August or Kisi. Which suggests that the strategy of being the central controller for the home may be flawed at a time when there is a lot of innovation around individual aspect of home automation (all of which can have their own complete experience).
No comments yet