Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
It turns out that seeking advice is one of the hardest things to do - at least it was for me for the longest time. Here is what I have learned from my own mistakes.
First, it is critical to have some people you really trust. People who have good judgment. Who understand you as person and who care about your emotional and spiritual well being (not just your commercial success). There are a great many people who will want to give you advice and you can learn something from most folks, but when it comes to crunch time and actually making a decision, not every piece of advice should be weighted the same.
Second, you have to be willing to provide all the relevant information to your trusted advisors. It is impossible for anyone to give good advice if they don’t have all the information. Holding back, especially bad news, is not a good strategy for seeking advice. One way you can tell if someone is to be trusted as an advisor (see above) is if they actively seek information that’s relevant. And then actually process that information.
Third, and probably hardest, is to actually listen to the advice you are getting. It is well known from cognitive research that we tend to hear what we want to hear. This is very different from saying you have to take the advice. You have to make your own decisions, but if you don’t pay extra strong attention to what you hear, then the effort on #1 and #2 above is wasted.
I have learned all of these the hard way and wrote this post mostly because I need to remind myself of these lessons. And I try to act accordingly as a board member, with the big caveat that there are times when economic interests can be significantly at odds. I will post another time on how I try to address that.
It turns out that seeking advice is one of the hardest things to do - at least it was for me for the longest time. Here is what I have learned from my own mistakes.
First, it is critical to have some people you really trust. People who have good judgment. Who understand you as person and who care about your emotional and spiritual well being (not just your commercial success). There are a great many people who will want to give you advice and you can learn something from most folks, but when it comes to crunch time and actually making a decision, not every piece of advice should be weighted the same.
Second, you have to be willing to provide all the relevant information to your trusted advisors. It is impossible for anyone to give good advice if they don’t have all the information. Holding back, especially bad news, is not a good strategy for seeking advice. One way you can tell if someone is to be trusted as an advisor (see above) is if they actively seek information that’s relevant. And then actually process that information.
Third, and probably hardest, is to actually listen to the advice you are getting. It is well known from cognitive research that we tend to hear what we want to hear. This is very different from saying you have to take the advice. You have to make your own decisions, but if you don’t pay extra strong attention to what you hear, then the effort on #1 and #2 above is wasted.
I have learned all of these the hard way and wrote this post mostly because I need to remind myself of these lessons. And I try to act accordingly as a board member, with the big caveat that there are times when economic interests can be significantly at odds. I will post another time on how I try to address that.
No comments yet