Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Let’s get the unimportant things out of the way right away. Several people had affairs. That to me has zero news value. And for all the “Why do powerful men cheat more?” headline writers, I suggest taking my Bayesian probability class on Skillshare when I teach it next.
But there are at least two important lessons here: First, we badly, badly need to update the Electronic Communications Privacy act from 1986. This was Senator Leahy’s bill and thankfully he has introduced a sensible update earlier this year. Let’s make sure this gets passed and doesn’t somehow fall over objections from those who want to spy on us more easily. As the New Yorker pointed out Petraeus was really the casualty of a kind of friendly fire incident – the ability to access information about and inside an email account without a court order is way too powerful a weapon.
Second, can we please get a CIA head who understands that using a shared draft folder in Gmail is useful only in movies? Google obviously tracks the IP for each access to the account and it is actually *easier* to detect an account that multiple people log in from different IPs than if they had created two separate gmail accounts (as far as I know, email between two gmail accounts does not make any external transit). So let’s please make sure the next CIA head at least knows what TOR is and maybe even a bit about how it works (it did after all originate from research sponsored by the US Naval Research Lab).
If L'Affaire Petraeus results in bringing email and other cloud communications under the proper fourth amendment protection and we get a tech savvy CIA head it will end up being good thing for the US.

Let’s get the unimportant things out of the way right away. Several people had affairs. That to me has zero news value. And for all the “Why do powerful men cheat more?” headline writers, I suggest taking my Bayesian probability class on Skillshare when I teach it next.
But there are at least two important lessons here: First, we badly, badly need to update the Electronic Communications Privacy act from 1986. This was Senator Leahy’s bill and thankfully he has introduced a sensible update earlier this year. Let’s make sure this gets passed and doesn’t somehow fall over objections from those who want to spy on us more easily. As the New Yorker pointed out Petraeus was really the casualty of a kind of friendly fire incident – the ability to access information about and inside an email account without a court order is way too powerful a weapon.
Second, can we please get a CIA head who understands that using a shared draft folder in Gmail is useful only in movies? Google obviously tracks the IP for each access to the account and it is actually *easier* to detect an account that multiple people log in from different IPs than if they had created two separate gmail accounts (as far as I know, email between two gmail accounts does not make any external transit). So let’s please make sure the next CIA head at least knows what TOR is and maybe even a bit about how it works (it did after all originate from research sponsored by the US Naval Research Lab).
If L'Affaire Petraeus results in bringing email and other cloud communications under the proper fourth amendment protection and we get a tech savvy CIA head it will end up being good thing for the US.

No comments yet