Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
A while back I did a series of posts on board effectiveness. In it I wrote the following about conducting a board meeting:
Actively solicit input on decisions from every board member. Some people are oddly quiet in group meetings. Don’t assume that means they are in agreement with everything that is being said. Yes, it should be the directors responsibility to speak up but that doesn’t mean they will. So don’t be afraid to call on a director and ask them what they think. That is especially true for anybody dialing into a meeting.
I have recently come to learn an important lesson: If the person running the board meeting is not doing this, it is critical for another board member to step in an make sure it happens.
This is especially important if the meeting is run by one of several founders and it is the other founders who are being quiet. While it is easy to assume that co-founders who are also board members would speak up if they disagree, that’s surprisingly often not the case. There may be odd internal dynamics going on or they may feel that the founders should resolve disagreements among themselves instead of at the board level. While that is true for trivial matters, it is not a good approach for disagreements on strategy or organization.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=3840,quality=85/http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=47f83292-a25c-4bfa-83d1-4737bc97845f)
A while back I did a series of posts on board effectiveness. In it I wrote the following about conducting a board meeting:
Actively solicit input on decisions from every board member. Some people are oddly quiet in group meetings. Don’t assume that means they are in agreement with everything that is being said. Yes, it should be the directors responsibility to speak up but that doesn’t mean they will. So don’t be afraid to call on a director and ask them what they think. That is especially true for anybody dialing into a meeting.
I have recently come to learn an important lesson: If the person running the board meeting is not doing this, it is critical for another board member to step in an make sure it happens.
This is especially important if the meeting is run by one of several founders and it is the other founders who are being quiet. While it is easy to assume that co-founders who are also board members would speak up if they disagree, that’s surprisingly often not the case. There may be odd internal dynamics going on or they may feel that the founders should resolve disagreements among themselves instead of at the board level. While that is true for trivial matters, it is not a good approach for disagreements on strategy or organization.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=3840,quality=85/http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=47f83292-a25c-4bfa-83d1-4737bc97845f)
No comments yet