Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>300 subscribers
>300 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Our kids are in a public school that is generally considered to be great (it better be, given the school taxes we are paying). Yet the math teaching is appalling compared to the teaching of English. In English there is a huge amount of repetition of basic exercises at every level. English is woven into other subject areas as well. Neither of these is true for math. There are ridiculous jumps from one level to the next. For instance, kids are introduced to subtraction and within short order are given multi-digit problems where they need to “borrow." There is a lack of repetition and re-enforcement before moving to the next level. It’s not surprising that kids resort to treating math problems mechanically, which runs completely counter to the professed goal of teaching them a deep understanding of math. When other subject areas are taught, there is an occasional math problem thrown in, but the emphasis is on building English skills. Much of this arises from treating Math as some kind of unfortunate necessity akin to brushing your teeth as opposed to a beautiful language that can be used to think about the world and express those thoughts to others. Approaching Math as a language would make many of the current practices stand out as wrong and suggest a myriad ways to improve teaching, like incorporating the history of math, number systems used by other civilizations and so on.
Our kids are in a public school that is generally considered to be great (it better be, given the school taxes we are paying). Yet the math teaching is appalling compared to the teaching of English. In English there is a huge amount of repetition of basic exercises at every level. English is woven into other subject areas as well. Neither of these is true for math. There are ridiculous jumps from one level to the next. For instance, kids are introduced to subtraction and within short order are given multi-digit problems where they need to “borrow." There is a lack of repetition and re-enforcement before moving to the next level. It’s not surprising that kids resort to treating math problems mechanically, which runs completely counter to the professed goal of teaching them a deep understanding of math. When other subject areas are taught, there is an occasional math problem thrown in, but the emphasis is on building English skills. Much of this arises from treating Math as some kind of unfortunate necessity akin to brushing your teeth as opposed to a beautiful language that can be used to think about the world and express those thoughts to others. Approaching Math as a language would make many of the current practices stand out as wrong and suggest a myriad ways to improve teaching, like incorporating the history of math, number systems used by other civilizations and so on.
No comments yet