Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
I just finished and highly recommend “The Biggest Bluff” by Maria Konnikova, which is our USV book club selection for January. It is nominally a book about Poker, but it is really about learning to live in a world where skill is confronted with luck again and again. An no, I don’t mean the world of poker, I mean the world at large.
Each chapter does a wonderful job of tightly weaving together an episode of Maria’s journey to becoming a poker pro with a much deeper discussion of a topic, such as luck or controlling one’s mental state. I don’t want to recap each of these here as you should read the book. Instead, I want to focus on one aspect that I particularly enjoyed: Maria’s zest for learning and the minimalist but highly effective tutoring she receives from poker pro Eric Seidel.
From the get go it is clear that Maria is really throwing herself into this, reading seminal texts and marking them up heavily. Most importantly she is learning the language of the domain (the book contains a fun glossary of some poker terms, although a subsequent edition should include the word “nut”). This to me has always been a sign of whether or not a student is serious. She also wonderfully relates how certain concepts only become fully intelligible once she starts playing. And not just playing a bit, but playing a lot. Nothing can be learned through theory alone, you must become a practitioner.
In her learning she benefits greatly from Eric’s tutoring. His approach comes across as having two key components: a relentless focus on the essentials and an introduction to others who provide different perspectives. This really had me reflecting on my own way of tutoring and I will adjust it pretty significantly as a result. He never seems to push her, instead gently suggesting potential next steps. But most importantly he continually asks her for an analysis of the hands she has played and then immediately brings that analysis back the essentials. This feels like a very powerful approach.
Overall then “The Biggest Bluff” works on three separate levels: as a fast paced story of entering the world of poker, as a series of accessible reflections on weighty topics (e.g., luck), and as an inspiration for learning and teaching.
I just finished and highly recommend “The Biggest Bluff” by Maria Konnikova, which is our USV book club selection for January. It is nominally a book about Poker, but it is really about learning to live in a world where skill is confronted with luck again and again. An no, I don’t mean the world of poker, I mean the world at large.
Each chapter does a wonderful job of tightly weaving together an episode of Maria’s journey to becoming a poker pro with a much deeper discussion of a topic, such as luck or controlling one’s mental state. I don’t want to recap each of these here as you should read the book. Instead, I want to focus on one aspect that I particularly enjoyed: Maria’s zest for learning and the minimalist but highly effective tutoring she receives from poker pro Eric Seidel.
From the get go it is clear that Maria is really throwing herself into this, reading seminal texts and marking them up heavily. Most importantly she is learning the language of the domain (the book contains a fun glossary of some poker terms, although a subsequent edition should include the word “nut”). This to me has always been a sign of whether or not a student is serious. She also wonderfully relates how certain concepts only become fully intelligible once she starts playing. And not just playing a bit, but playing a lot. Nothing can be learned through theory alone, you must become a practitioner.
In her learning she benefits greatly from Eric’s tutoring. His approach comes across as having two key components: a relentless focus on the essentials and an introduction to others who provide different perspectives. This really had me reflecting on my own way of tutoring and I will adjust it pretty significantly as a result. He never seems to push her, instead gently suggesting potential next steps. But most importantly he continually asks her for an analysis of the hands she has played and then immediately brings that analysis back the essentials. This feels like a very powerful approach.
Overall then “The Biggest Bluff” works on three separate levels: as a fast paced story of entering the world of poker, as a series of accessible reflections on weighty topics (e.g., luck), and as an inspiration for learning and teaching.
No comments yet