Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
I recently read “Seveneves” by Neal Stephenson and just last night finished “The Dark Forest” which is the second book in the “Three Body Problem” trilogy by Cixin Liu. What these books have in common is that they look at a threat to humanity’s existence and probe our responses to it. This literature is timely because we face such a threat in the form of climate change.
The message from the books is clear: only scientific knowledge and staying rational can get humanity past a global threat. This is where I see the biggest danger from Trump. It is full on assault on both science and rational thought. As I have written previously, much of what Trump does is explicitly designed to appeal to what Kahnemann calls System 1 – the rapid fire, jump to conclusions part of our brain that we use effortlessly and which stands in the way of in-depth rational thought, which requires time and effort.
Climate change is an existential threat to humanity. It can only be addressed globally. And it requires massive innovation beyond what we have already accomplished with clean energy. The history of American leadership has largely been one of embracing science starting with the Founding Fathers. Abandoning this tradition, at a time when the world needs it more than ever, is a grave mistake.
I recently read “Seveneves” by Neal Stephenson and just last night finished “The Dark Forest” which is the second book in the “Three Body Problem” trilogy by Cixin Liu. What these books have in common is that they look at a threat to humanity’s existence and probe our responses to it. This literature is timely because we face such a threat in the form of climate change.
The message from the books is clear: only scientific knowledge and staying rational can get humanity past a global threat. This is where I see the biggest danger from Trump. It is full on assault on both science and rational thought. As I have written previously, much of what Trump does is explicitly designed to appeal to what Kahnemann calls System 1 – the rapid fire, jump to conclusions part of our brain that we use effortlessly and which stands in the way of in-depth rational thought, which requires time and effort.
Climate change is an existential threat to humanity. It can only be addressed globally. And it requires massive innovation beyond what we have already accomplished with clean energy. The history of American leadership has largely been one of embracing science starting with the Founding Fathers. Abandoning this tradition, at a time when the world needs it more than ever, is a grave mistake.
No comments yet