Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
I just spent a couple of days in Vienna, Austria at a conference. The upcoming Austrian elections were the talk of the town. One of the major parties is campaigning in part on the promise of introducing an estate tax for all estates about 1 million Euros. Austria has a wealth distribution that is also highly concentrated with the top 1% of the population controlling 40% of total wealth.
Also during the last couple of days the new tax proposal by the Trump administration includes an elimination of the estate tax, despite the current exemption being already more than $5 million. Put differently, only estates above $5 million pay estate tax. The argument that this forces millions of farms and small businesses to be sold has been thoroughly debunked as most of them fall below this threshold.
To me the most fascinating aspect of the estate tax debate is how it relates to the justification for a universal basic income (UBI). One of the objection to a UBI is: what have people done to deserve it? The answer of course is that people don’t need to have done anything to deserve it. We can afford UBI because we collectively have inherited the technological, social and economic progress made by the generations that came before us.
Often the very people who want to eliminate the estate tax are the ones bringing up the “but they don’t deserve it” objection to UBI, seemingly oblivious to the complete logical contradiction this entails. So: if you believe that anyone deserves to inherit significant money from their parents, then you have no standing question whether people deserve a UBI.
I just spent a couple of days in Vienna, Austria at a conference. The upcoming Austrian elections were the talk of the town. One of the major parties is campaigning in part on the promise of introducing an estate tax for all estates about 1 million Euros. Austria has a wealth distribution that is also highly concentrated with the top 1% of the population controlling 40% of total wealth.
Also during the last couple of days the new tax proposal by the Trump administration includes an elimination of the estate tax, despite the current exemption being already more than $5 million. Put differently, only estates above $5 million pay estate tax. The argument that this forces millions of farms and small businesses to be sold has been thoroughly debunked as most of them fall below this threshold.
To me the most fascinating aspect of the estate tax debate is how it relates to the justification for a universal basic income (UBI). One of the objection to a UBI is: what have people done to deserve it? The answer of course is that people don’t need to have done anything to deserve it. We can afford UBI because we collectively have inherited the technological, social and economic progress made by the generations that came before us.
Often the very people who want to eliminate the estate tax are the ones bringing up the “but they don’t deserve it” objection to UBI, seemingly oblivious to the complete logical contradiction this entails. So: if you believe that anyone deserves to inherit significant money from their parents, then you have no standing question whether people deserve a UBI.
No comments yet