Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Following up to yesterday’s post, here is what I think folks should do about the threat of platform lock-in at the application/content layer. First, recognize that this is directly related to net neutrality. The ability of existing platforms and content owners to try to force the web back into walled gardens is limited by the ability of entrepreneurs to start open competitors and reach people directly and on a level playing field. Second, start voting with your mouse. At the moment we have enough variety on the web in most categories that if any one provider is over-reaching, you have alternatives available. For instance, for political coverage you can head over to a site such as politico.com that has been built from the ground up for the web, including an extensive set of RSS feeds. Third, support an independent web browser. Much as I like Chrome and its speed, I believe that a strong and healthy Mozilla Foundation that pushes Firefox forward will keep everyone honest. Other than that, we need to all watch out carefully for what is happening at the content and application layer, as eventually we may need to extend the net neutrality concept in that direction (for instance, by ensuring that endusers can change content inside the browser as they see fit, e.g. via plugins).
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=3840,quality=85/http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=5e111c1a-7b62-4a6a-9638-681d2a813aa5)
Following up to yesterday’s post, here is what I think folks should do about the threat of platform lock-in at the application/content layer. First, recognize that this is directly related to net neutrality. The ability of existing platforms and content owners to try to force the web back into walled gardens is limited by the ability of entrepreneurs to start open competitors and reach people directly and on a level playing field. Second, start voting with your mouse. At the moment we have enough variety on the web in most categories that if any one provider is over-reaching, you have alternatives available. For instance, for political coverage you can head over to a site such as politico.com that has been built from the ground up for the web, including an extensive set of RSS feeds. Third, support an independent web browser. Much as I like Chrome and its speed, I believe that a strong and healthy Mozilla Foundation that pushes Firefox forward will keep everyone honest. Other than that, we need to all watch out carefully for what is happening at the content and application layer, as eventually we may need to extend the net neutrality concept in that direction (for instance, by ensuring that endusers can change content inside the browser as they see fit, e.g. via plugins).
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=3840,quality=85/http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=5e111c1a-7b62-4a6a-9638-681d2a813aa5)
No comments yet