Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>300 subscribers
>300 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
I used to read the NYT every morning as a way to get an overview of what was happening in the world, find in-depth coverage and investigative reports, and see opinions on politics and the economy (I also used to do the same with the WSJ). But increasingly I find that I only skim the paper and then head for my computer to read techmeme and the Huffington Post. Both are great at what they do, but leave me yearning for more.
I want a personalized new service that meets the following needs
Covers a large universe of news sources by default that includes well-known blogs.
Lets me add additional sources for myself
Allows me to define my interests easily (ideally making use of my past work, as reflected in say my del.icio.us tags and urls)
Learns over time what I like and don’t primarily from my behavior (but gives me the option to explicitly give a thumbs up or down and control the amount of information that I get
Let’s me supply my existing social graph from places such as LinkedIn, Facebook and my email and makes use of that graph for filtering
Uses some amount of human “editing” to rate, select and update sources, major stories, etc. as input to and on top of algorithms to ensure highest quality
Such a service would get at least 30 minutes to 1 hour of my attention every day.
I just got back from a great trip to San Francisco and Silicon Valley where I met with three different companies all working on this problem. They are each trying different approaches and it’s encouraging to see so much energy devoted to this problem. There are also some interesting efforts that have already launched, such as Newser and Daylife. But so far none of them get close to meeting my wishlist. So who will be my New York Times?
I used to read the NYT every morning as a way to get an overview of what was happening in the world, find in-depth coverage and investigative reports, and see opinions on politics and the economy (I also used to do the same with the WSJ). But increasingly I find that I only skim the paper and then head for my computer to read techmeme and the Huffington Post. Both are great at what they do, but leave me yearning for more.
I want a personalized new service that meets the following needs
Covers a large universe of news sources by default that includes well-known blogs.
Lets me add additional sources for myself
Allows me to define my interests easily (ideally making use of my past work, as reflected in say my del.icio.us tags and urls)
Learns over time what I like and don’t primarily from my behavior (but gives me the option to explicitly give a thumbs up or down and control the amount of information that I get
Let’s me supply my existing social graph from places such as LinkedIn, Facebook and my email and makes use of that graph for filtering
Uses some amount of human “editing” to rate, select and update sources, major stories, etc. as input to and on top of algorithms to ensure highest quality
Such a service would get at least 30 minutes to 1 hour of my attention every day.
I just got back from a great trip to San Francisco and Silicon Valley where I met with three different companies all working on this problem. They are each trying different approaches and it’s encouraging to see so much energy devoted to this problem. There are also some interesting efforts that have already launched, such as Newser and Daylife. But so far none of them get close to meeting my wishlist. So who will be my New York Times?
No comments yet