Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Whenever my kids tell me how their teachers don’t want them to use Wikipedia as a source I redouble my effort to show them why Wikipedia is important and how it works. In particular, I make sure they understand how to look at the history of a page and to check out the discussion or “talk” page that sits behind the content page. Two principles of those pages are critically important. First, they are inclusive by allowing anyone to contribute to the process at least initially (on some controversial subjects there are eventual restrictions). Second, they provide a complete historical and entirely public record of change.
The New York City General Assembly which is the governance for Occupy Wallstreet is successfully emulating these principles in a real world deliberation process. Anyone can participate in the working groups and the General Assembly (open access) and there are detailed minutes online from both the coordinators’ meetings and the General Assembly itself (public record).
The contrast between Wikipedia, Occupy Wallstreet and how our Congress is run couldn’t be more stark. Instead of doing the bulk of its work in openly accessible committees and on the floor of the House and the Senate, most drafting of legislation happens behind closed doors. Access to those drafting the bills is largely regulated by money with access being available to those who fill the campaign coffers of the politicians.
What is to be done? We need to figure out how to use technology to bring the principles of open access and public record to government. Together these could help overcome the influence of money in politics.
Whenever my kids tell me how their teachers don’t want them to use Wikipedia as a source I redouble my effort to show them why Wikipedia is important and how it works. In particular, I make sure they understand how to look at the history of a page and to check out the discussion or “talk” page that sits behind the content page. Two principles of those pages are critically important. First, they are inclusive by allowing anyone to contribute to the process at least initially (on some controversial subjects there are eventual restrictions). Second, they provide a complete historical and entirely public record of change.
The New York City General Assembly which is the governance for Occupy Wallstreet is successfully emulating these principles in a real world deliberation process. Anyone can participate in the working groups and the General Assembly (open access) and there are detailed minutes online from both the coordinators’ meetings and the General Assembly itself (public record).
The contrast between Wikipedia, Occupy Wallstreet and how our Congress is run couldn’t be more stark. Instead of doing the bulk of its work in openly accessible committees and on the floor of the House and the Senate, most drafting of legislation happens behind closed doors. Access to those drafting the bills is largely regulated by money with access being available to those who fill the campaign coffers of the politicians.
What is to be done? We need to figure out how to use technology to bring the principles of open access and public record to government. Together these could help overcome the influence of money in politics.
No comments yet