>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Yesterday, I tweeted “welcome to the googlenet” and was asked to explain what I meant by that. My tweet was about the announcement of Google DNS. With Google DNS, you can now run pretty much entirely on a Google stack. You fire up Chrome OS (or maybe just the Chrome browser), point DNS to Google, get your content from Google (e.g., music integrated into search results or driving directions), work with Google apps and other applications run of Google servers via Google AppEngine, and so forth. Potentially, even doing so with new Google developed protocols. This is a totally vertically integrated single source solution to the Internet.
Now in theory, at no point are you actually boxed in and everything is supposed to be open and standards compliant. But the temptation to cross the line and give Google owned properties an unfair leg up and start pushing aside rivals and startups is huge. It will take so little to go from “creating the best possible Internet experience” to “creating the best possible Google experience.” The company itself is publicly traded and a lot of employees wealth correlates directly to the price of Google stock. On the margin, I believe that drives behavior more than any corporate commitment to not be evil.
Just to be clear, I am not suggesting that anyone at Google is actively setting out to take over and control the web. I am, however, worried that the cumulative effect of all the initiatives, combined with economic incentives for decision makers, amounts to an important threat to the open Web.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=3840,quality=85/http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=dd394ede-ad52-4a4c-a729-07a4c0bc0d7d)
Yesterday, I tweeted “welcome to the googlenet” and was asked to explain what I meant by that. My tweet was about the announcement of Google DNS. With Google DNS, you can now run pretty much entirely on a Google stack. You fire up Chrome OS (or maybe just the Chrome browser), point DNS to Google, get your content from Google (e.g., music integrated into search results or driving directions), work with Google apps and other applications run of Google servers via Google AppEngine, and so forth. Potentially, even doing so with new Google developed protocols. This is a totally vertically integrated single source solution to the Internet.
Now in theory, at no point are you actually boxed in and everything is supposed to be open and standards compliant. But the temptation to cross the line and give Google owned properties an unfair leg up and start pushing aside rivals and startups is huge. It will take so little to go from “creating the best possible Internet experience” to “creating the best possible Google experience.” The company itself is publicly traded and a lot of employees wealth correlates directly to the price of Google stock. On the margin, I believe that drives behavior more than any corporate commitment to not be evil.
Just to be clear, I am not suggesting that anyone at Google is actively setting out to take over and control the web. I am, however, worried that the cumulative effect of all the initiatives, combined with economic incentives for decision makers, amounts to an important threat to the open Web.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=3840,quality=85/http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=dd394ede-ad52-4a4c-a729-07a4c0bc0d7d)
No comments yet