Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
Philosophy Mondays: Human-AI Collaboration
Today's Philosophy Monday is an important interlude. I want to reveal that I have not been writing the posts in this series entirely by myself. Instead I have been working with Claude, not just for the graphic illustrations, but also for the text. My method has been to write a rough draft and then ask Claude for improvement suggestions. I will expand this collaboration to other intelligences going forward, including open source models such as Llama and DeepSeek. I will also explore other moda...

Intent-based Collaboration Environments
AI Native IDEs for Code, Engineering, Science
Web3/Crypto: Why Bother?
One thing that keeps surprising me is how quite a few people see absolutely nothing redeeming in web3 (née crypto). Maybe this is their genuine belief. Maybe it is a reaction to the extreme boosterism of some proponents who present web3 as bringing about a libertarian nirvana. From early on I have tried to provide a more rounded perspective, pointing to both the good and the bad that can come from it as in my talks at the Blockstack Summits. Today, however, I want to attempt to provide a coge...
>300 subscribers
>300 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Facebook recently released Messenger as a separate mobile app. Google+ launched with multiple separate mobile apps (Google+, Huddle, Places). What’s going on here? We are seeing the results of limited screen real estate combined with effective notification systems and a fully logged in user on mobile. Unlike on the desktop (Microsoft) and even the browser (Google, Facebook) this means that large integrated apps or even “suites” have no advantage from a usability perspective. For instance, when I get a foursquare notification, I wind up in the foursquare app at the right place. I am already signed in (the phone is a single user device) and can immediately start to interact.
That is great news for startups that are targeting specific areas that are also being attacked by the bigger players. The big players, however, may still hold an advantage on the back end. They potentially have more data available to themselves on the specific user and his or her social graph to be able to deliver a richer front-end experience. One way to think about this is that with mobile we have entered the era of data bundling rather than functionality bundling as a source of competitive advantage. This has a couple of important implications for startups. First, make sure that you can get your hands on all the data you need to deliver a compelling user experience - either by getting it from your users or partnering with others who can provide it. Second, if you are generating valuable data don’t just fork that over to a big company if that company is already or will likely be competing with you.
Competition in mobile is now maybe in the second inning. So there is still a lot that will happen. But I believe the part to pay most attention to will be invisible. It’s data where the real battles will be fought.
Facebook recently released Messenger as a separate mobile app. Google+ launched with multiple separate mobile apps (Google+, Huddle, Places). What’s going on here? We are seeing the results of limited screen real estate combined with effective notification systems and a fully logged in user on mobile. Unlike on the desktop (Microsoft) and even the browser (Google, Facebook) this means that large integrated apps or even “suites” have no advantage from a usability perspective. For instance, when I get a foursquare notification, I wind up in the foursquare app at the right place. I am already signed in (the phone is a single user device) and can immediately start to interact.
That is great news for startups that are targeting specific areas that are also being attacked by the bigger players. The big players, however, may still hold an advantage on the back end. They potentially have more data available to themselves on the specific user and his or her social graph to be able to deliver a richer front-end experience. One way to think about this is that with mobile we have entered the era of data bundling rather than functionality bundling as a source of competitive advantage. This has a couple of important implications for startups. First, make sure that you can get your hands on all the data you need to deliver a compelling user experience - either by getting it from your users or partnering with others who can provide it. Second, if you are generating valuable data don’t just fork that over to a big company if that company is already or will likely be competing with you.
Competition in mobile is now maybe in the second inning. So there is still a lot that will happen. But I believe the part to pay most attention to will be invisible. It’s data where the real battles will be fought.
No comments yet